Federal judge rejects BigLaw firm’s sanctions request in gender bias suit

1 Attorneys

#1 Attorneys Network

1 Legal - 1 Lawyers - 1 Attorneys

Injury Lawyer - Criminal - Foreclosure - Divorce

 

Judiciary

gender bias

Photo from Shutterstock.com.

A federal judge in San Francisco has denied Morrison & Foerster’s request for sanctions in a suit claiming “mommy track” gender bias by the law firm.

U.S. Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley of San Francisco rejected the motion during arguments Thursday, the Recorder reports.

Morrison & Foerster had claimed that the law firm for the plaintiffs, Sanford Heisler Sharp, wrongly added a plaintiff to the suit who had signed a release of claims after being fired for performance issues. The associate had been represented by counsel who obtained a better deal for her before she signed the release.

The plaintiff had alleged that she signed while under economic duress because of economic uncertainty at a time when she was pregnant.

Corley said that allegation was sufficient to support her claim, according to the Recorder’s coverage.

Corley warned Sanford Heisler against bringing a retaliatory sanctions motion against Morrison & Foerster. “We’re just going to stop and move forward,” she said.

Corley also warned that the plaintiffs who are listed as Jane Does in the complaint will have to be identified if the case moves forward.




1 Attorneys
1 Attorneys

1 Legal

#1 Attorneys Search Engine

1 Legal is part of the 1 Search Project

Practice Areas - News - Federal - State - Contact Us


Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Facebooktwitterlinkedinrss

1 Attorneys

#1 Attorneys Network

1 Legal - 1 Lawyers - 1 Attorneys

Injury Lawyer - Criminal - Foreclosure - Divorce

 


Leave a Reply