Insight -In race to curb climate change, cities outpace governments

1 Attorneys

#1 Attorneys Network

1 Legal - 1 Lawyers - 1 Attorneys

Injury Lawyer - Criminal - Foreclosure - Divorce

 

By Environment Correspondent Alister Doyle | OSLO

OSLO Cities from Oslo to Sydney are setting
goals to curb climate change that exceed national targets,
causing tensions with central governments about who controls
policy over green energy and transport and construction.

More than 2,500 cities have issued plans to cut carbon
emissions to the United Nations since late 2014, setting an
example to almost 200 nations that reached a Paris Agreement in
December 2015 to fight global warming.

Although there are no officially collated statistics
available, many city targets are more ambitious than those set
by governments under the Paris accord, which imposes no
obligations on cities, regions or companies to define goals.

Just over half the world’s population lives in urban areas,
meaning municipalities will help to determine whether the
historic shift from fossil fuels to cleaner energy agreed in
Paris succeeds or fails.

But as many cities become more assertive, governments are
reluctant to cede control.

“Cities are starting to encroach past their boundaries on
policies at a national level,” said Seth Schultz, director of
research at the New York-based C40 climate group that includes
most of the world’s megacities, from Tokyo to Los Angeles.

“There will be more and more conflicts,” he said, over
defining policies to curb local air pollution and help wider
aims to limit droughts, mudslides, heat waves and rising seas.

The trend is clearest in rich cities, which are more able to
cut emissions to meet the demands of affluent,
environmentally-conscious voters than fast-expanding cities such
as Bangkok, Nairobi or Buenos Aires.

One example of the growing friction: Oslo, where left-wing
authorities are at odds with Norway’s right-wing government over
their push to more than halve the capital’s greenhouse gas
emissions within four years to about 600,000 tonnes, one of the
most radical carbon reduction intentions in the world.

The plan for the city of 640,000 people includes car-free
zones, “fossil-fuel-free building sites”, high road tolls and
capturing greenhouse gases from the city’s waste incinerator.

In a sign of city power, a 2016 study projected that climate
plans by cities and regions could cut an extra 500 million
tonnes of annual greenhouse gas emissions by 2030 – equivalent
to the emissions of France – beyond cuts pledged by governments.

“The benefits are very local in cities – less air pollution,
better public transport,” said Niklas Hoehne, one of the authors
at the NewClimate Institute think-tank in Germany.

DIESEL POLLUTION

But that doesn’t always sit well with central governments.
Many of Oslo’s green ideas are anathema to voters of the
populist right-wing Progress Party, which together with the
Conservatives forms the coalition government.

Deputy Mayor Lan Marie Nguyen Berg said the government was
delaying Oslo’s plan for new road tolls which reach 58 crowns
($7) for diesel cars in rush hour.

“The Transport Ministry is dragging its feet”, by demanding
large, new road signs to explain the varying costs and to modify
computer systems to register passing vehicles, she said.

Norway’s Transport Minister Ketil Solvik-Olsen, of the
Progress Party, said the ministry was cooperating. Berg “is
making an invalid argument,” he said.

Still, a Nov. 4 letter from the ministry obtained by Reuters
told the Norwegian Public Roads Administration to design a
national computer system for the environmental road tolls rather
than one just for Oslo – the only city that wants the system.

The letter said the extra work would delay the project by
three months, until October 2017.

“That’s convenient for the Progress Party,” one government
official said, because national elections are due in September
and the party will not be associated with unpopular tolls. The
city has also been slow to submit detailed plans.

BUSES VS TRAINS

Cities in other parts of the world also face hurdles as they
step up actions to press on with their own targets for carbon
emissions that often exceed their governments’ goals under the
Paris accord.

In Australia, Sydney is in a dispute with the national
government in Canberra because the city wants to generate more
electricity locally, without paying high charges for using the
national grid, Lord Mayor Clover Moore said.

Sydney is now a local energy generator through its solar
initiatives but has to pay “the same charges as a remote coal or
gas station that exports its power hundreds of kilometres,” she
said.

But the government’s Australian Energy Market Commission
said in December that Sydney’s plan for “local generation
network credits” would be too costly to implement. It cited an
estimate of A$233 million ($176.12 million) in extra costs for
consumers by 2050.

Moore dismissed the findings, saying credits would mean a
fairer system overall.

And Copenhagen Lord Mayor Frank Jensen said colleagues “in
cities around the globe are demanding more legislation … to
transform our cities to be more green”.

He complained that fees paid to the government for
electricity from the national grid used by green buses in
Denmark – often under city control – were too high compared to
those for trains that are controlled by the government on a
countrywide network.

TRUMP FACTOR

Perhaps nowhere in the world is the difference between
government and city more stark than in America.

U.S. President Donald Trump rejects the scientific consensus
that climate change is man-made and said during his election
campaign that he would “cancel” the Paris Agreement and favour
domestic fossil fuel production. But Trump’s plans are unclear –
the president has since said he has an “open mind” about Paris.

On Thursday, Scott Pruitt, the new head of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, said he is unconvinced that
man-made carbon dioxide is the main driver of climate change, a
conclusion widely embraced by scientists.

If Trump relaxes standards for clean air, power plants or
vehicles “there would be a greater burden on cities to implement
programs to fill the gaps,” said Amy Petri of the office of
sustainability in the Texas city of Austin.

That would make it hard for Austin to reach its goals to cut
emissions by 2020, she said. Still, mayors in 12 big U.S. cities
including Austin, Los Angeles, Chicago and Boston this week
reaffirmed a commitment to the Paris deal.



1 Attorneys
1 Attorneys

1 Legal

#1 Attorneys Search Engine

1 Legal is part of the 1 Search Project

Practice Areas - News - Federal - State - Contact Us


Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Facebooktwitterlinkedinrss

1 Attorneys

#1 Attorneys Network

1 Legal - 1 Lawyers - 1 Attorneys

Injury Lawyer - Criminal - Foreclosure - Divorce

 


Leave a Reply