U.S. top court rebuffs ‘Sister Wives’ challenge to Utah anti-bigamy law

1 Attorneys

#1 Attorneys Network

1 Legal - 1 Lawyers - 1 Attorneys

Injury Lawyer - Criminal - Foreclosure - Divorce

 

By Andrew Chung

<span class="articleLocation”>The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday turned away a
challenge to Utah’s anti-bigamy law brought by the polygamist
stars of the popular reality television show “Sister Wives.”

The justices declined to take up an appeal by Kody Brown and
his four wives, only one of whom he is legally married to, of a
lower court’s ruling that threw out their challenge that claimed
Utah’s law banning multiple spouses violated their religious
liberty rights under the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment.

They also claimed the law violated their legally protected
right to privacy.

After the show first aired on cable television network TLC
in 2010, authorities in Utah announced they were investigating
the family for violations of the anti-bigamy law. Fearing
criminal prosecution, the family moved to Nevada in 2011.

The Utah law prohibits not only polygamy but also
cohabitation by married people.

“Sister Wives” revolves around the lives of Kody Brown and
wives Meri, Janelle, Christine and Robyn, as well as their many
children. The family has a religious belief in polygamy,
according to court papers.

Brown and the four women are fundamentalist Mormons, part of
the Apostolic United Brethren Church.

The family sued Utah authorities in Salt Lake City federal
court. The district court found that part of the law relating to
cohabitation violated the Constitution but the rest was lawful.
The family appealed but the Denver-based 10th U.S. Circuit Court
of Appeals tossed out the case because Kody Brown and the four
women “faced no credible threat of prosecution.”

While Utah’s state attorney general had a policy not to
prosecute polygamists under the anti-bigamy law unless other
crimes were involved, such as child abuse or domestic violence,
Jeffrey Buhman, the county attorney for Utah County, did not
have a similar policy in place.

During the litigation, however, Buhman adopted the same
prosecution policy, prompting the 10th Circuit to throw out the
case.

The family appealed to the Supreme Court. They should not be
blocked from moving forward with their suit based on a new
policy that could easily be revoked by officials in the future,
the family told the justices.

The case in the Supreme Court of the United States is Kody
Brown et al v. Jeffrey Buhman, No. 16-333.



1 Attorneys
1 Attorneys

1 Legal

#1 Attorneys Search Engine

1 Legal is part of the 1 Search Project

Practice Areas - News - Federal - State - Contact Us


Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Facebooktwitterlinkedinrss

1 Attorneys

#1 Attorneys Network

1 Legal - 1 Lawyers - 1 Attorneys

Injury Lawyer - Criminal - Foreclosure - Divorce

 


Leave a Reply